Benjamin Freedmans brev til David Goldstein

I noen tidligere innlegg har jeg så vidt vært innom Benjamin Freedman. Han var “jøden” (han benyttet selv anførselstegn når han beskrev dagens jøder) som brukte store deler av sin ikke ubetydelige formue på å grave i sin egen slekts historie og raskt bestemte seg for at det var hans plikt å fortelle verden sannheten om “jødene”. Jeg tror brevet først ble publisert og gjengitt i boka Facts will be Facts, men jeg sliter med å finne en gratisutgave av denne. Brevet er heldigvis gjengitt helt eller delvis i flere andre bøker og på en mengde nettsider. Selv leste jeg det første gang i Texe Marrs bok DNA Science and the Jewish Bloodline (2013). Originalbrevet var datert 10. oktober 1954. Jeg siterer det i sin helhet slik andre har sitert det. Her er brevet:

You will probably also be astonished as the 150,000,000 Christians years ago when I electrified the nation with the first publication by me of the facts disclosed by my many years of research into the origin and the history of the so-called or self-styled «Jews» in eastern Europe. My many years of intensive research established beyond the question of any doubt, contrary to the generally accepted belief held by Christians, that the so-called or self-styled «Jews» in eastern Europe at any time in their history in eastern Europe were never the legendary «lost ten tribes» of Bible lore. That historic fact is incontrovertible.

Relentless research established as equally true that the so-called or self-styled «Jews» in eastern Europe at no time in their history could be correctly regarded as the direct lineal descendants of the legendary «lost ten tribes» of Bible lore. The so-called or self-styled «Jews» in eastern Europe and modern history cannot legitimately point to a single ancestor who ever even set a foot on the soil of Palestine in the era of Bible history. Research also revealed that the so-called or self-styled «Jews» in eastern Europe were never «Semites,» are not «Semites» now, nor can they ever be regarded as «Semites» at any future time by any stretch of the imagination. Exhaustive research also irrevocably rejects as a fantastic fabrication the generally accepted belief by Christians that the so-called or self-styled «Jews» in eastern Europe are the legendary «Chosen People» so very vocally publicized by the Christian clergy from their pulpits.

Maybe you can explain to me, my dear Dr. Goldstein, the reason why and just how the origin and the history of the Khazars and Khazar Kingdom was so well concealed from the world for so many centuries? What secret mysterious power has been able for countless generations to keep the origin and the history of the Khazars and Khazar Kingdom out of history text-books and out of classroom courses in history throughout the world? The origin and history of the Khazars and Khazar kingdom are certainly incontestable historic facts and also establish beyond any question of doubt the origin and history of the so-called or self-styled «Jews» in eastern Europe.

The origin and history of the Khazars and Khazar kingdom and their relationship to the origin and early history of the so-called or self-styled «Jews» in eastern Europe was one of history’s best kept secrets until wide publicity was given in recent years to my research on this subject. Do you not think, my dear Dr. Goldstein, that it is time this whole subject was dragged out of its hiding place?

In the year of 1948 in the Pentagon in Washington I addressed a large assembly of the highest officers of the United States Army in the G2 branch of military intelligence on the highly explosive geopolitical situation in eastern Europe and the Middle East. Then as now, that area of the world was a potential threat to the peace of the world and to the security of this nation. I explained to them fully the origin of the Khazars and Khazar Kingdom. I felt then as I feel now that without a clear and comprehensive knowledge of that subject it is not possible to understand or to evaluate properly what has been taking place since 1917, the year of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. It is the «key» to that problem.

Upon the conclusion of my talk a very alert Lieutenant Colonel present at the meeting informed me that he was the head of the history department of one of the largest and highest scholastic rated institutions of higher education in the United States. He had taught history there for 16 years. He had recently been called back to Washington for further military service. To my astonishment he informed me that he had never in all his career as a history teacher or otherwise heard the word «Khazar» before he heard me mention it there. That must give you some idea, my dear Dr. Goldstein, of how successful that mysterious secret power was with their plot to «black out» the origin and the history of the Khazars and Khazar Kingdom in order to conceal from the world and particularly Christians the true origin and the history of the so-called or self-styled «Jews» in eastern Europe.

The Russian conquest in the tenth through thirteenth centuries of the little-known-to-history Khazars apparently ended the existence for all time of the little-known-to-history 800,000 square mile sovereign kingdom of the so-called or self-styled «Jews» in eastern Europe, known then as the Khazar Kingdom. Historians and theologians now agree that this political development was the reason for the «Important Change in the Wording of the `Kol Nidre'» by Meir ben Samuel in the eleventh century, and for the policy adopted by the so-called or self-styled «Jews» that «The Law of Revocation in Advance was Not Made Public.» Will you be patient with me while I review here as briefly as I can the history of that political emergence and disappearance of a nation from the pages of history?

Prior to the tenth century the Khazar Kingdom had already been reduced by Russian conquests to an area of about 800,000 square miles. As you will observe on this map reproduced from the Jewish Encyclopedia the territory of the Khazar in the tenth century was by far the largest of any in Europe. The population of the Kingdom was made up for the most part of the Khazars with the addition of the remnants of the populations of the 25 peaceful agricultural nations that had inhabited this approximate 1,000,000 square miles before their conquest by the invading Khazars. In the first century B.C. the Khazars invaded eastern Europe from their homeland in Asia. The Khazars invaded eastern Europe via the land route between the north end of the Caspian Sea and the south end of the Ural Mountains.

khazar-map

The Khazars were not «Semites.» They were an Asiatic Mongoloid nation. They are classified by modern anthropologists as Turko-Finns racially. From time immemorial the homeland of the Khazars was in the heart of Asia. They were a very warlike nation. The Khazars were driven out of Asia finally by the nations in Asia with whom they were continually at war. The Khazars invaded eastern Europe to escape further defeats in Asia. The very warlike Khazars did not find it difficult to subdue and conquer the 25 peaceful agricultural nations occupying approximately 1,000,000 square miles in eastern Europe. In a comparatively short period the Khazars established the largest and most powerful kingdom in Europe, and probably the wealthiest also.

The Khazars were a pagan nation when they invaded eastern Europe. Their religious worship was a mixture of phallic worship and other forms of idolatrous worship practiced in Asia by pagan nations. This form of worship continued until the seventh century. The vile forms of sexual excesses indulged in by the Khazars as their form of religious worship produced a degree of moral degeneracy the Khazar’s king could not endure.

In the seventh century King Bulan, ruler at that time of the Khazar Kingdom, decided to abolish the practice of phallic worship and other forms of idolatrous worship and make one of the three monotheistic religions, about which he knew very little, the new state religion. After a history session with representatives of the three monotheistic religions, King Bulan decided against Christianity and Islam and selected as the future state religion the religious worship then known as «Talmudism,» and now known and practiced as «Judaism.» This event is well documented in history.

King Bulan and his 4,000 feudal nobles were promptly converted by rabbis imported from Babylonia for that event. Phallic worship and other forms of idolatry were thereafter forbidden. The Khazar kings invited large numbers of rabbis to come and open synagogues and schools to instruct the population in the new form of religious worship. It was now the state religion. The converted Khazars were the first population of so-called or self-styled «Jews» in eastern Europe. So-called or self-styled «Jews» in eastern Europe after the conversion of the Khazars are the descendants of the Khazars converted to «Talmudism,» or as it is now known «Judaism,» by the mass conversion of the Khazar population.

After the conversion of King Bulan, none but a so-called or self-styled «Jew» could occupy the Khazar throne. The Khazar Kingdom became a virtual theocracy. The religious leaders were the civil administrators also. The religious leaders imposed the teachings of the Talmud upon the population as their guide to living. The ideologies of the Talmud became the axis of political, cultural, economic and social attitudes and activities throughout the Khazar kingdom. The Talmud provided civil and religious law.

It might be very interesting for you, my dear Dr. Goldstein, if you have the patience, to allow me to quote for you here from Volume IV, pages 1 to 5, of the Jewish Encyclopedia. The Jewish Encyclopedia refers to the Khazars as «Chazars.» The two spellings are optional according to the best authorities. The two are pronounced alike. Either Khazar or «Chazar» is pronounced like the first syllable of «costume» with the word «Czar» added onto it. It is correctly pronounced «cos(tume) Czar.» The Jewish Encyclopedia has five pages on the Khazars but I will skip through them:

«CHAZARS: A people of Turkish origin whose life and history are interwoven with the very beginnings of the history of Jews of Russia…driven on by the nomadic tribes of the steppes and by their own desire for plunder and revenge…In the second half of the sixth century the Chazars moved westward…The kingdom of the Chazars was firmly established in most of South Russia before the foundation of the Russian monarchy by the Varangians (885)…At this time the kingdom of the Chazars stood at the height of its power and was constantly at war…At the end of the eighth century…the chagan (king) of the Chazars and his grandees, TOGETHER WITH A LARGE NUMBER OF HIS PEOPLE; EMBRACED THE JEWISH RELIGION…The Jewish population in the entire domain of the Chazars, in the period between the seventh and tenth centuries, must have been considerable…about the ninth century, IT APPEARS AS IF ALL THE CHAZARS WERE JEWS AND THAT THEY HAD BEEN CONVERTED TO JUDAISM ONLY A SHORT TIME BEFORE…It was one of the successors of Bulan named Obadiah, who regenerated the kingdom and STRENGTHENED THE JEWISH RELIGION. He invited Jewish scholars to settle in his dominions and founded SYNAGOGUES AND SCHOOLS. The people were instructed in the Bible, Mishnah, and the TALMUD and in the ‘divine service of the hazzanim’…In their writings the CHAZARS USED THE HEBREW LETTERS…the Chazar languages predominated…

«Obadiah was succeeded by his son Isaac; Isaac by his son Moses (or Manasseh II); the latter by his son Nisi; and Nisi by his son Aarron II. King Joseph himself was a son of Aarron, and ascended the throne in accordance with the law of the Chazars relating to succession…The king had twenty-five wives all of royal blood, and sixty concubines, all famous beauties. Each one slept in a separate tent and was watched by a eunuch…this seems to have been the beginning of the downfall of the Chazar kingdom…The Russian Varangians established themselves at Kiev…until the final conquest of the Chazars by the Russians… After a hard fight the Russians conquered the Chazars…Four years later the Russians conquered all of the Chazarian territory east of the Azov…Many members of the Chazarian royal family emigrated to Spain…Some went to Hungary, BUT THE GREAT MASS OF THE PEOPLE REMAINED IN THEIR NATIVE COUNTRY.»

The greatest historian on the origin and the history of the so-called or self-styled «Jews» in eastern Europe was Professor H. Graetz, himself a so-called or self-styled «Jew.» Professor H. Graetz points out in his famous History of the Jews that as so-called or self-styled «Jews» in the Khazar Kingdom, they believed these converted Khazars to be the «lost ten tribes.» These rumors were no doubt responsible for the legend which grew up that Palestine was the «homeland» of the converted Khazars. On page 141 in his History of the Jews Professor H. Graetz states:

«The Chazars professed a coarse religion, which was combined with sensuality and lewdness…After Obadia came a long series of Jewish Chagans (kings) for according to a fundamental law of the state, only Jewish rulers were permitted to ascend the throne…For some time the Jews of other countries had no knowledge of the CONVERSION OF THIS POWERFUL KINGDOM TO JUDAISM, and when at last a vague rumor to this effect reached them, they were of the opinion that Chazaria was peopled by the remnant of the former ten tribes.»

When Khazars in the first century B.C. invaded eastern Europe their mother-tongue was an Asiatic language, referred to in the Jewish Encyclopedia as the «Khazar languages.» They were primitive Asiatic dialects without any alphabet or any written form. When King Bulan was converted in the seventh century, he decreed that the Hebrew characters he saw in the Talmud and other Hebrew documents were thereupon to become the alphabet for the Khazar language. The Hebrew characters were adopted to the phonetics of the spoken Khazar language. The Khazars adopted the characters of the so-called Hebrew language in order to provide a means for providing a written record of their speech. The adoption of the Hebrew characters had no racial, political or religious implication.

The western European uncivilized nations which had no alphabet for their spoken language adopted the alphabet of the Latin language under comparable circumstances. With the invasion of western Europe by the Romans, the civilization and the culture of the Romans was introduced into these uncivilized areas. Thus the Latin alphabet was adopted for the language of the French, Spanish, ENGLISH, Swedish and many other western European languages. These languages were completely foreign to each other yet they all use the same alphabet. The Romans brought their alphabet with their culture to these uncivilized nations exactly like the rabbis brought the Hebrew alphabet from Babylonia to the Khazars when they introduced them in the form of the Talmud’s alphabet.

Since the conquest of the Khazars by the Russians and the disappearance of the Khazar Kingdom the language of the Khazars is known as Yiddish. For about six centuries the so-called or self-styled «Jews» of eastern Europe have referred to themselves while still resident in their native eastern European countries as «Yiddish» by nationality. They identified themselves as «Yiddish» also. There are today in New York City as you know, my dear Dr. Goldstein, many «Yiddish» newspapers, «Yiddish» theatres, and many other cultural organizations of so-called or self-styled «Jews» from eastern Europe which are identified publicly by the word «Yiddish» in their title.

Before it became known as the «Yiddish» language, the mother-tongue of the Khazars added many words to its limited ancient vocabulary as necessity required. These words were acquired from the languages of its neighboring nations with whom they had political, social or economic relations. Languages of all nations add to their vocabularies in the same way. The Khazars adapted words to their requirements from the German, the Slavonic and the Baltic languages. The Khazars adopted a great number of words from the German language. The Germans had a much more advanced civilization than their Khazar neighbors and the Khazars sent their children to German schools and universities.

The «Yiddish» language is not a German dialect. Many people are led to believe so because «Yiddish» has borrowed so many words from the German language. If «Yiddish» is a German dialect acquired from the Germans, then what language did the Khazars speak for the 1000 years they exited in eastern Europe before they acquired culture from the Germans? The Khazars must have spoken some language when they invaded eastern Europe. What was that language? When did they discard it? How did the entire Khazar population discard one language and adopt another all of a sudden? The idea is too absurd to discuss. «Yiddish» is the modern name for the ancient mother-tongue of the Khazars with added German, Slavonic and Baltic adopted and adapted numerous words.

«Yiddish» must not be confused with «Hebrew» because they both use the same characters as their alphabets. There is not one word of «Yiddish» in ancient «Hebrew» nor is there one word of «Hebrew» in «Yiddish.» As I stated before, they are as totally different as Swedish and Spanish which both likewise use the same Latin characters for their alphabets. The «Yiddish» language is the cultural common denominator for all the so-called or self-styled «Jews» in or from eastern Europe. To the so-called or self-styled «Jews» in or from eastern Europe, «Yiddish» serves them like the English language serves the populations of the 48 states of the United States. Their cultural common denominator throughout the 48 states is the English languages, or wherever they may emigrate and resettle. The English language is the tie which binds them to each other. It is the same with the «Yiddish» language and so-called or self-styled «Jews» throughout the world.

«Yiddish» serves another very useful purpose for so-called or self-styled «Jews» throughout the world. They possess in «Yiddish» what no other national, racial or religious group can claim. Approximately 98% of the world’s so-called or self-styled «Jews» living in 42 different countries of the world today are either emigrants from eastern Europe, or their parents emigrated form eastern Europe. «Yiddish» is a language common to all of them as their first or second language according to where they were born. It is an «international» language to them. Regardless of what country in the world they may settle in they will always find co-religionists who also speak «Yiddish.» «Yiddish» enjoys other international advantages too obvious to describe here. «Yiddish» is the modern language of a nation, which has lost its existence as a nation. «Yiddish» never had a religious implication, although using Hebrew characters for its alphabet. It must not be confused with words like «Jewish.» But it is very much.

Directly north of the Khazar Kingdom at the height of its power a small Slavic state was organized in 820 A.D. on the south shore of the Gulf of Finland where it flows into the Baltic Sea. This small state was organized by a small group of Varangians from the Scandinavian peninsula on the opposite shore of the Baltic Sea. The native population of this newly formed state consisted of nomad Slavs who had made their home in this area from earliest recorded history. This infant nation was even smaller than our state of Delaware. This newly-born state however was the embryo which developed into the great Russian Empire. In less than 1000 years since 820 A.D. this synthetic nation expanded its borders by ceaseless conquests until it now includes more than 9,500,000 square miles in Europe and Asia, or more than three times the area of continental United States, and they have not stopped.

During the tenth, eleventh, twelfth, and thirteenth centuries the rapidly expanding Russian nation gradually swallowed up the Khazar kingdom, its neighbor directly to the south. The conquest of the Khazar kingdom by the Russians supplies history with the explanation for the presence after the thirteenth century of the large number of so-called or self-styled «Jews» in Russia. The large number of so-called or self-styled «Jews» in eastern Europe after the destruction of the Khazar Kingdom were thereafter no longer known as Khazars but as the «Yiddish» populations of these many countries. They so refer to themselves today.

In the many wars with her neighbors in Europe after the thirteenth century Russia was required to cede to her victors large areas which were originally part of the Khazar Kingdom. In this manner Poland, Lithuania, Galicia, Hungary, Rumania, and Austria were acquired from Russia territory, originally a part of the Khazar Kingdom. Together with this territory the nations acquired a segment of the population of so-called or self-styled «Jews» descended from the Khazars who once occupied the territory. These frequent boundary changes by the nations in eastern Europe explains the presence today of so-called or self-styled «Jews» in all these countries who all trace their ancestry back to the converted Khazars. Their common language, their common culture, their common religion, and their common racial characteristics classify them all beyond any question of doubt with the Khazars who invaded eastern Europe in the first century B.C. and were converted to «Talmudism» in the seventh century.

The so-called or self-styled «Jews» throughout the world today of eastern European origin make up at least 90% of the world’s total present population of so-called or self-styled «Jews.» The conversion of King Bulan and the Khazar nation in the seventh century accomplished for «Talmudism,» or for «Judaism» as «Talmudism» is called today, what the conversion of Constantine and the western European nations accomplished for Christianity. Christianity was a small, comparatively unimportant religious belief practiced principally in the eastern Mediterranean area, until the conversion to the Christian faith of the large populations of the western European pagan nations after the conversion of Constantine. «Talmudism» the civil and religious code of the Pharisees, most likely would have passed out of existence like the many other creeds and cults practiced by the peoples in that area before, during and after «Pharisaism» assumed its prominent position among these creeds and cults in the time of Jesus. «Talmudism,» as «Pharisaism» was called later, would have disappeared with all its contemporary creeds and cults but for the conversion of the Khazars to «Talmudism» in the seventh century. At that time «Talmudism» was well on its way towards complete oblivion.

In the year 986 A.D. the ruler of Russia, Vladimir III, became a convert to the Christian faith in order to marry a Catholic Slavonic princess of a neighboring sovereign state. The marriage was otherwise impossible. Vladimir III thereupon also made his newly-acquired faith the state religion of Russia, replacing the pagan worship formerly practiced in Russia since it was founded in 820 A.D. Vladimir III and his successors as the rulers of Russia attempted in vain to convert his so-called or self-styled «Jews,» now Russian subjects, to Russia’s Christian state religion, and to adopt the customs and culture of the numerically pre-dominant Russian Christian population. The so-called or self-styled «Jews» in Russia refused and resisted this plan vigorously.

They refused to adopt the Russian alphabet in place of the Hebrew characters used in their «Yiddish» language. They resisted the substitution of the Russian language for «Yiddish» as their mother-tongue. They opposed every attempt to bring about the complete assimilation of the former sovereign Khazar nation into the Russian nation. They resisted with every means at their disposal. The many forms of tension which resulted produced situations described by history as «massacres,» «pogroms,» «persecution,» discrimination etc.

In Russia at that period in history it was the custom as in other Christian countries in Europe at that time to take an oath, vow or pledge of loyalty to the rulers, the nobles, the feudal landholders and others in the name of Jesus Christ. It was after the conquest of the Khazars by the Russians that the wording of the «Kol Nidre» (All Vows) prayer was regarded as the «law.» The effect of this «LAW OF REVOCATION IN ADVANCE» obtained for all who recited it each year on the eve of the Day of Atonement divine dispensation from all obligations acquired under «oaths, vows and pledges» to be made or taken in the COMING YEAR. The recital of the «Kol Nidre» (All Vows) prayer on the eve of the Day of Atonement released those so-called or self-styled «Jews» from any obligation under «oaths, vows or pledges: entered into during the NEXT TWELVE MONTHS. The «oaths, vows and pledges» made or taken by so-called or self-styled «Jews» were made or taken with «tongue in cheek» for twelve months.

The altered version of the «Kol Nidre: (All Vows) prayer created serious difficulties for the so-called or self-styled «Jews» when its wording became public property. It apparently did not remain a secret very long, although the Talmud states, «the law of revocation in advance was not made public.» The altered version of the «Kol Nidre» (All Vows) prayer soon became known as the «Jews Vow» and cast serious doubt upon «oaths vows or pledges» given to Christians by so-called or self-styled «Jews.» Christians soon believed that «oaths, vows or pledges» were quite worthless when given by so-called or self-styled «Jews.» This was the basis for so-called «discrimination» by governments, nobles, feudal landholders, and others who required oaths of allegiance and loyalty from those who entered their service.

All intelligent attempt was made to correct this situation by a group of German rabbis in 1844. In that year they called an international conference of rabbis in Brunswick, Germany. They attempted to have the «Kol Nidre» (All Vows) prayer completely eliminated from the Day of Atonement ceremonies, and entirely abolished from any religious service of their faith. They felt that the secular prologue to the Day of Atonement ceremonies was void of any spiritual implication and did not belong in the synagogue ritual. However, the preponderant majority of the rabbis attending that conference in Brunswick came from eastern Europe. They represented the congregations of Yiddish-speaking, so-called or self-styled «Jews» of converted Khazar origin in eastern Europe. They insisted that the altered version of the «Kol Nidre» (All Vow) prayer be retained exactly as it was then recited on the Day of Atonement. They demanded that it be allowed to remain as it had been recited in eastern Europe since the change by Meir ben Samuel six centuries earlier. It is today recited in exactly that form throughout the world by so-called or self-styled «Jews.» Will the 150,000,000 Christians in the United States react any differently when they become more aware of its insidious implications?

How genuine can the implications, inferences and innuendoes of the so-called «brotherhood» and «interfaith» movements be under these circumstances? These so-called movements are sweeping the nation like prairie fires. If the Talmud is the axis of the political, economic, cultural and social attitudes and activities of so-called or self-styled «Jews» participating in these two so-called movements, how genuine are the «oaths, vows or pledges» taken or given in connection with these two so-called movements by so-called or self-styled «Jews?» It would be a superlative gesture of «brotherhood» or of «interfaith» if the National Conference of Christians and Jews succeeded in expunging from the Talmud all anti-Christ, anti-Christian, and anti-Christianity passages. At a cost of many millions of dollars the National Conference of Christians and Jews succeeded in expunging from the New Testament passages which so-called or self-styled «Jews» regarded as offensive to their faith. A great portion of the cost was supplied by so-called or self-styled «Jews.» Christians might now supply funds to expunge from the Talmud passages offensive to the Christian faith. Otherwise the so-called «brotherhood» and «interfaith» movements are merely mockeries.

3 thoughts on “Benjamin Freedmans brev til David Goldstein

  • 30. mai 2016 at 14:20
    Permalink

    Hei Jostemikk
    Dette er et interessant tema. Hva er en jøde? Hva er etymologien til benevnelsen Jøde? Hva er en Israelitt, og hva er opprinnelsen / Etimylogien til termen Israelitt? Israelsfolket oppstod omtrent samtidig med det Kinesiske folk og skulle i dag utgjøre formidabelt antall, men hvor ble de av, hvor er de nå?

    Kong Bulan tok religionen judaisme, men hva beveget ham til det? Er det en grunn til at «khazar» høres så likt ut med «Keiser,» på østeuropeisk «Tsar»?

  • 30. mai 2016 at 15:52
    Permalink

    Hei, Kjell Erik!

    Har tygd litt på spørsmålene dine og må innrømme at de er blant de vanskeligste jeg noen gang er stilt. Forsøker meg på et delvis svar, og så kan du korrigere det du mener er feil. Israelfolket er arierne, og hele 1. og 2. verdenskrig ser ut til å ha vært et forsøk på utryddelse av dem. I dag er det å være jøde, eller «jøde», noe som er begrunnet gjennom raselære og DNA/gener, altså pur rasisme, mens ingen lenger tør nevne dette med ariere. Ofte tenker jeg at Hitler var en del av hele elendigheten med å utrydde nettopp det han ga et dårlig rykte ved å påstå at han var en forkjemper for, det ariske folket. Muligheten for at Hitler var jøde og fullstendig klar over det og stolt av det er ganske stor. Muligens lot bankoligarkene ham i stikken fordi han etter å ha tjent dem vel ble en belastning så stor at problemet måtte løses. Det er heller ikke vitenskapelig dokumentert på noen som helst slags måte at han faktisk døde i 1945, så det er mye å tenke på angående det som skjedde.

    Beklager at det ble et del-svar. Dette med kong Bulans tvangskonvertering av eget folk vet jeg ikke annet om enn det jeg har lest om at det tydeligvis var om og gjøre å få hentet noen Babylonske talmudister for full opplæring så raskt som mulig. Kanskje han så det som en mulighet til å få hevnet at «de hvite» hadde tatt fra ham store områder av det som en gang ble kalt Khazaria? Det har jo vært et par store krigsherrer i det området av Lilleasia og litt østenfor.

  • 31. mai 2016 at 01:09
    Permalink

    Hei, Kjell Erik
    Jeg skal prøve å svare på noen av spørsmålene dine, etter det jeg har funnet ut etter en del år med «studier».

    «Hva er en jøde?»
    Det finnes tre typer jøder; 1 de som nedstammer fra bibelske Judah,(som nedstammer fra Sem (semitt), en av Noahs tre sønner) 2; de som følger Torahen/Gamle Testamentet, men ikke er av Judahs slekt 3: Politiske jøder (eller som Bibelen viser til: de som kaller seg jøder, men er ikke jøder), og det er disse som skaper trøbbel. Khazarene (Ashkenazi, som nedstammer fra Jafet, en annen sønn av Noah) er blant disse.

    «Hva er en Israelitt, og hva er opprinnelsen / Etimylogien til termen Israelitt?»
    En israelitt er en som nedstammer Israel (døpt Jacob), som da fikk 12 sønner, deriblant Judah. Denne søskenflokken delte seg etterhvert i to; House of Israel i nord og House of Judah i sør. Først ble Israel tatt av assyrerne, og israelfolket dro etterhvert til Kaukasus, og så etterpå ble Judea tatt av babylonerne, men fikk returnert til landet etter mange generasjoner i fangenskap. Når jeg leste artikkelen her kom jeg på: kan det har skjedd at israelittene rømte fra Kaukasus da khazarene kom? Den hvite rase har jo hatt dette i passe på engelsk «caucasian», fordi den kom fra Kaukasus. Dette kan også stemme med storinnvandingen til Norge 100-200 år e.Kr. Nå hadde det vært folk her lenge før det, men dette var slektingen av de som kom fra Kaukasus. Så alle ekte jøder er israelitter, men alle israelitter er ikke jøder, de er også danitter (Danmark), benjamitter, levitter, rubenitter osv.

    «Israelsfolket oppstod omtrent samtidig med det Kinesiske folk og skulle i dag utgjøre formidabelt antall, men hvor ble de av, hvor er de nå?» Anbefaler deg å lese denne grundige artikkelserien her, den vil gi deg svar, og kanskje noen flere spørsmål 🙂 http://magasinet-innsyn.no/index.php/artikler/israel/item/62-israels-ti-tapte-stammer-del-1

    PS: Staten Israel består omtrent ikke av ekte jøder (av blod), og praktisk talt ingen israelitter, så statens navn er villedende.

Legg igjen en kommentar

Din e-postadresse vil ikke bli publisert. Obligatoriske felt er merket med *

Optionally add an image (JPEG only)

%d bloggere liker dette: